patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Despite Primary Loss, SC in Mitt's Corner

South Carolina expected to continue to stay red.

 

Mitt Romney and South Carolina voters have never been a very good match. Whether it is the former Massachusetts governor’s religion or his lack of consistency on issues that matter to the Palmetto State’s overwhelmingly conservative electorate, Romney just hasn’t aroused much passion. He finished a distant fourth in the 2008 South Carolina Primary with 15 percent of the vote. This year, as the presumptive GOP nominee and with the support of Gov. Nikki Haley and State Treasurer Curtis Loftis, Romney finished 12 percentage points behind Newt Gingrich.

Such apathy towards Romney gave Democrats hope that maybe South Carolina could be winnable after all. A poll in December confirmed as much. Last month, Karl Rove said that the state is up for grabs. But, if the sampling of voters and sources with whom Patch spoke is any barometer, Democrats should not get their hopes up. A variety of factors are working against them. One of which is the still the influence of the Tea Party in the state. Though few of them supported Romney in January, the Tea Party’s relentless get-out-the-vote efforts should help in a way that is a reversal of the norm in campaigns. Typically, the top of the ticket — as with Barack Obama in 2008 — helps candidates further down the ticket at the state and county level. But some members of the Tea Party think drumming up interest in local races could help them achieve their main goal — the ousting of President Obama.

That’s the approach Karen Martin of the Spartanburg County Tea Party takes. "We want to make the downticket so compelling that people will come out to vote, and while they’re out there they’ll out there vote for Romney," she said.

Other voters concede that Romney was not their first choice, but that they will vote for him. Bill Pomeroy of Simpsonville, who voted for Gingrich in the primary, is one such voter. He said, “A vote for Romney is a vote against Obama.”

Jim Wofford, a right-leaning independent from Fountain Inn, who also voted for Gingrich, agreed with Pomeroy. Wofford said that Obama’s recent comments in support of gay marriage only assured a stronger turnout for Romney. “If you want to get anything done in South Carolina you need the Baptists. And the Baptists will come out to vote for Romney after hearing Obama come out for gay marriage.”

Haley, in an appearance in Greenville on Monday, said that she does not think Obama’s support of gay marriage will have an impact on turnout. “(His) gay marriage stance is just another way to distract from the economy and that’s all he can do is distract because he’s failed as a president.”

Karen Floyd, publisher of Palladian View and a former State GOP Chair, said there is a lot of overlap among voters concerned about social issues and those concerned about a stagnant economy.

“The values voters are not Gov. Romney’s core.” Floyd said. “But they share much of the same interests as those within the GOP for whom the economy is the main issue. And this election is about the economy.”

Haley concurred and added, “Values voters elected a 38 year-old Indian-American female for governor. I have faith that the voters of South Carolina will come out for Gov. Romney.”

Even Democrats seem to acknowledge this, as a good portion of the time at their convention this past weekend in Columbia was spent discussing how they could help Obama — in North Carolina, a battleground state thought to be critical to the president’s re-election and one that he has already visited multiple occasions.

But the GOP plans on putting up a fight in the Tar Heel State. When asked on Monday if she plans on spending a lot of time in North Carolina in the coming months campaigning on Romney's behalf, Haley said simply, “Yes.”

Related Topics: Mitt Romney South Carolina and Nikki Haley

Jonathan Edwards

6:16 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012

The fact that SC voted for Gingrich says a lot. They despise a black man who is clearly a loving family man, yet they adore a man who has left several wives for despicable reasons.
www.jonathanpedwards.com

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Davis

9:02 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012

Wow, so we should vote for Obama because he is a "loving family man"? Fortunately Romney has Obama beat in the "loving family man" department ... and he actually might know how to fix the economy at the same time.

Comment_arrow

JoSCh

12:46 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

Romney has Obama beat in the "loving family man" department? How Jeff? I'm curious how I can win this contest and what Obama has done to lose it. What is the criteria?

SC voted for Gingrich over Romney, so family values obviously isn't quite as big a concern for SC Republicans as some believe.

What would indicate to you that the economy is on the mend? Besides "Any Republican in office" or Fox News reporting it without caveat? I mean, it's better now that it was at the end of the previous administrations term by most measures. DJI, home sales, consumer confidence. Unemployment is near what is was when the current president took office and has been trending down for the last 2.5 years. What exactly would it take for you to put America before your ideology, or acknowledge facts even if they aren't what your rigid worldview predicted? I'd like to know if there is a cure for this new phenomena.

marian

7:42 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012

judge tha you noy be judged

Reply

Debbie P

5:28 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

I'm voting the democrats out. ALL of them. I'm not "Just Fine" and neither is anyone I know. I'm 55 and scared as hell for my future and that of my tenage children (who can't get a first job anywhere, despite looking every day). How do they make their dreams come true? I have no idea if it's even possible in the nesr future.

Reply
Comment_arrow

reg

8:11 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

please remember where all this started, Debbie. Given the trend that followed the tax laws passed by Bush and his GOP congress, then the enormous spending they did (not to mention going to foreign companies that didn't pay US taxes) - all that's been happening for the last couple of years is the backlash from the previous prez. Don't shoot the messenger -

Comment_arrow

stanley seigler

9:44 pm on Thursday, June 14, 2012

@Debbie P: "...I'm 55 and scared as hell for my future and that of my tenage children (who can't get a first job anywhere, despite looking every day)..."

and debbie has every right to be scared as hell...as am i, scare as hell that the GOPs will be elected in 2012 and repeat the economic policies that resulted in the great 1929 hoover GOP recession and the great 2008 W-GOP recession...

it will be strike three for our great country...

DEMs policies got our country out of the GOP 1929 ditch and are getting us out of the 2008 ditch...the strike three ditch may be too deep for any recovery.

debbie, etal should not have voted for T-GOP in 2010...T-GOPs blocked all job creation policies BO/DEMs proposed.

as asked several times what is one GOP policy that worked...

Comment_arrow

JoSCh

9:17 am on Friday, June 15, 2012

Really? Sounds like you and "everyone you know" had an extremely tough run of luck, maybe it's you? Most people are pretty much on the same trajectory as they were 6 years ago. And by "most" I mean a significant majority in numbers, you know, the definition of most.

Also, at least here in the greater Charleston area there really aren't all that many democrats to vote out. But whatever you do don't blame the Republicans, the people that form most of the government that you blame for all of your problems, real or imagined.

Don't let facts get in the way of your hyperbolic hysteria.

Leave a comment